FORBIDDEN WEBSITES

Nowadays,being closed some websites due to its content has brought about many debates. I think,to close a website completely because of its content is not acceptable.Both it is against the freedom of opinion and expression and everyone has a brain to distinguish between what is right and what is wrong.Firstly,each individual has the right to think and express these thoughts and feelings freely.The idea of closing websites restricts to basic rights to the freedom of opinion and expression.If we live in a democratic country, It is out of question.Secondly,everyone has the ability to think and realise what is good or what is bad.Please let us decide ourselves what websites are appropriate to enter.On the other hand,those who are against this ideas may say that children are most vulnerable to these sites which contain sexual or violence content because they can appear in resulting results.To a certain extent they are right.But families can use strict filtering for search results.So that they can prevent their children from entering these sites.To conclude,a website shouldn't be closed because of its content.

FREE DOWNLOAD !

Free downloading have become so common, haven't it ?Downloading MP3s,films and different software programs from internet without paying any money should be regarded as illegal.Firstly,creativity is destroyed because people don't value the owners of work for their endeavorsWhile they are spending a lot of time which may be take years on their works, we people have them within minutes by downloading.Secondly,more and more high quality products are decreasing.As a result,musical,cinematic and literary sectors of a country lose their chance to compete in the international area.On the other hand,those who are against these ideas may say that the price of them is too high to afford it.To a certain extent they are right.But make sure that creating the work of art is not easy for the owner of it at all.Please let its price be high...

OUTLINE

THESIS STATEMENT:Downloading MP3s,films, and different software programs from the internet without paying any money should be regarded as illegal.
ARGUMENT FOR 1:Creativity is destroyed because people don't value the owners of work for their endeavors.
ARGUMENT FOR 2:More and more ,high quality products are decreasing.As a result,musical,cinematic and literary sectors of the country lose their chance to compete in the international area.
COUNTER ARGUMENT:The price of them is too high to afford it.
REFUTATION OF THE COUNTER ARGUMENT:Make sure that creating the work of art is not easy for the owner of it at all.Please let its price high..

English Medium Education

Nowadays,English is carried out as the language of instruction in public schools and universities in countries where it may not be first language spoken by students.English, as a medium of instruction should be followed in everywhere.Firstly,studenst will become proficient in english not only in conversation but in academic subjects.Because it is an international languge,they have to learn English to get a good job and make money anyway or in order to learn it they'll spend money.So, having English as the language of instruction removes the connection between having money and having to chance to learn English. Secondly,English, as the language of the instruction tends to benefit most those who already have a strong backround in English.They have the opportunity to improve their language.However,the opponents of this idea claim that English policy cause students with weaker English language skills to drop out of school, and in this way the policy may hurt the country in general than it helps.To a certain extent they are right.But they have to learn that language sooner or later if they want to be successful in their job.To conclude,English medium education is the simplest way to learn or improve English which is important today.

THE RIGHT TO LIVE

The Right to Die

A difficult problem that is facing society is euthanasia, another word for mercy killing. Thousands of young people are mortally ill because of incurable disease. They are all kept alive in artificial ways. They have no chance to recover completely, but most of the legal systems do not allow doctors to end their lives. However, fatally ill patients should be allowed to die for several reasons.

The first reason is that medical costs are very high. The cost of a hospital room can be as much as a hundred dollars per day and even more. The costs of medicines and medical tests are also high. The family of the patient is responsible for these expenses. Consequently, they would be a terrible financial burden for them for a long time.

The second reason is that the family suffers. The nurses can only give the terminally ill patient minimum care. The family must spend time to care for the special needs of their loved one. They should talk, touch, and hold the patient even though he or she may be in a coma. For example, Karen Quinlan’s parents visited her every day even though she was unable to speak or to see. Also, it is very difficult to watch a loved one in a coma because his or her condition does not improve.

The third and most important reason is that the patients have no chance of recovery. They can never lead normal lives and must be kept alive by life – support machines. They may need a machine to breathe and a feeding tube to take in food. They are more dead than alive and will never get better. For example, in 1975, Karen Quinlan became unconscious after the she swallowed some drugs and drank alcohol. She was kept alive by machines. Her parents knew that her body and brain would never be normal. Therefore, they asked the court to allow their daughter to die. The judge agreed, and Karen’s breathing machine was turned off. She was able to breathe on her own, but she died nine years later in June of 1985.

In conclusion, because terminally ill patients have no chance to live normal lives, they should be allowed to die with dignity. Therefore, the family should have the right to ask to turn off the life-support machines or to stop further medical treatment.

Everyone has the right to live her/his own life...

When a person becomes really terminally ill, does he/she have the right to give up her life or does the family of the patient have the authority to decide for the euthanisia instead of the patient who is too ill to make a decision?This kind of questions are only a few which are supposed to be answered in related to euthanasia.The issue of euthanisia is having a tremendous impact on society.The stronger and more widely held opinion is against euthanisia primarily because it's god's task to determine when his humans' time has come and we as humanbeings are in no position to behave as god and end somebody's life.So,incurably ill patients shouldn't be allowed to die for a few reasons.First of all, it is claimed that medical costs are very high.But,it is not more important and valuable than human life.There is always a chance to get money from someone or somewhere in any way.After terminating her /his life,there is no return,she/he is gone.Secondly,it is asserted that the family of the patient can't bear to watch her/him being in a coma.How can they accept her/his death while they can't endure such pain as watching her/his condition?At least,they can talk , touch his/her hand and feel the warmth of her/his body.Thirdly,that terminally ill patients have no chance to live their lives doesn't mean that we should let them die.Every doctor can tell stories of patients expected to die within days who surprise everyone with their extraordinary recoveries.In conclusion,it can't be ignore the importance and value of human life.Everyone has the right to live her/his own life...

WHICH ONE ??

Today, online education competes with traditional education on every level.Especially,they are strikingly different from each other when compared in terms of cost considerations and personality of learners.Firstly,typically, online education doesn't have to deal with the costs of classrooms. Housing costs for students is another expense that online education students don't have to contend with.The cost of traveling to the school site can also be an added expense if you're taking traditional courses.Secondly,your personality type can also be significant in choosing whether to follow an online education as opposed to traditional education.For example,by nature, an introvert will like online education because she won't have to deal with people. She can learn in the comfort of her home, independent of others.On the other hand,traditional education requires an interaction with others.To conclude,by taking into consideration these criteria,you can decide which one is suitable for you.

ALWAYS ALONE..

How do we learn everything?Obviously,in everyday life there are lots of things people can learn.Learning all these things is only in their hands.People can learn better by themselves than with a teacher.Firstly,online education is a simple way to learn languages, other subjects and to increase our professionalism.Collaborating with people from different cultures and levels of experience is a potential benefit that can enhance the learning environment and provide learners with a wider network of contacts. Online classes may offer special benefits to learners who are shy, have difficulty keeping pace with teachers.Secondly, they can pause whenever they want and don't have to learn everything in detail which sometimes contains unnecessary things.By learning on their own ,they decide what they are supposed to learn and when they will begin or finish themselves.Nevertheless, there are necessarily something important that can be taught only by a teacher; because, the role of teachers is not only to transfer knowledge to the students but also to facilitate learning ,to prepare materials and lesson plans according to the learning styles of the students.But,every student has their own way of learning that works best for them. Some learn visually others do better when they "learn by doing." Because the student know better himself/herself in terms of his/her learning styles,he/she will not need to a teacher to learn.To conclude,people can learn better on their own than with a teacher.